UK councils trial blackouts to help reduce carbon emissions

Thousands of street lamps in the UK are being switched off after midnight in a bid to cut energy bills and meet climate change targets. It has been said that a council can save up to £100,000 a year by switching off street lights, and reduce carbon emissions by up to 600 tonnes per year.

However there has been much backlash at the new scheme – a Police leader has said that good street lighting reduces crime and helps the public to feel safe whilst also reducing the risk of road accidents therefore although switching off the lights may be great for en environment, a close eye needs to be kept on local crime and accident rates to ensure that the scheme does not have a detrimental effect on the local community.

It is not the first time that such schemes have been proposed in the UK. Hampshire County Council last month cancelled their street lighting switch-off scheme after residents complained that it was encouraging vandalism and burglary.

Council representatives have denied that switching off the lights between midnight and 5am could put lives at risk. They have pointed out that street lighting costs taxpayers hundreds of millions of pounds each year and councils are always on the lookout for ways to provide better value for money.

It has been suggested that instead of looking at draconian blackout measures, councils should be looking to replace their streetlamps with a more environmentally friendly option. Currently, a standard sodium street lamp costs between £30 and £40 a year to run with many councils having at least 100,000 lights to deal with. Adding a timer to the lights costs about £100 and some believe this is not the most cost effective scheme – instead, councils should perhaps follow Toronto’s example where street light bulbs are being replaced with LEDs.

LEDs are said to use less electricity than a standard bulb, so will help cut down on energy costs, whilst emitting the same amount of light. LEDs also have a life-span of around 10 years compared to an average bulb’s lifespan of just two years. This also means that LEDs have a smaller carbon footprint that their sodium equivalents.

[?]
Share This

Popularity: 14% [?]

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
Save Compare

RSS Feed for This PostPost a Comment

Related Articles

  • Going green with LED street lighting It seems LED street lights are the new thing in North America with a city near Detroit replacing all the bulbs in it’s street lights...
  • Anchorage trials LED lighting It seems that LED lighting has caught the imagination of councils around the world. Anchorage in Alaska is the latest place to draw up a...
  • Litroenergy – a new form of lighting Litroenergy is a new, patent pending lighting technology which could revolutionalise the lighting industry. Litroenergy is a light source material that can emit light for...
  • M&S unveils plastic wine bottles to reduce carbon footprint UK High Street giant Marks and Spencer has announced plans to replace glass bottles in the 25cl wine range to plastic. The move is aimed...
  • Energy Saving Light Bulb Headache? With the EU gearing up towards a ban on ordinary light bulbs in favour of energy saving ones, there is more controversy over the new...

    • What is the best source of renewable energy?

      View Results

    Subscriptions

    Syndicate this site using RSS
    The latest comments to all posts in RSS
    Add to My Yahoo!
    Add to My MSN
    Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET News.com
    Subscribe in Rojo
    Subscribe in Google Reader
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Subscribe with Bloglines
    Furl It!


    Close
    E-mail It